Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 4 Next »

Prioritization Issues to Discuss

  1. When importing billings from the grid, should we be creating ledger codes that do not exist? The regular import does a get-or-create on the ledger code, there is no separate import. 

    1. Add an option to create missing ledger codes and default to true?

    2. Do we always want to create the ledger codes or should this be optional?  Or always create them when they don’t exist?  If they choose NO then you’ll receive an error if a ledger code doesn’t exist. 

  2. Do you want to be able to edit the billing number?
    1. Downside - if you’ve sent the bill out to the customer; there will be a disconnect between the bill and the customer.
    2. Benefit - the billing number can be corrected if needed.
    3. Would you prefer billing and payment numbers be auto assigned, meaning you can not manually enter the billing or payment numbers at all?  Like Classic, wouldn't be able to change, must delete and re-post.
      1. If an error with the billing number is made (numbers transposed and gap created): If the bill is already sent to user, district will have to update in transaction configuration to set new high number to fill in the gap.
  3. Billing service date, should this default to a specific date if the user does not populate it?
  4. Billing grid default sort is by due date and then billing number, is this the desired default sort?



All Issues Created Since  

key summary type created updated due assignee reporter priority status resolution

Unable to locate Jira server for this macro. It may be due to Application Link configuration.

  • No labels